“Real change begins when we learn to see possibility where others see pressure.” That idea reflects the reality of today’s discussion on two familiar strategic tools or model: SWOT and SOAR. Both in comparison are designed to help organisations understand where they stand and where they are going, but they approach strategy from very different angles. One leans on diagnosis and the other on aspiration. One examines problems, the other amplifies potential. Yet both can shape strategic business direction depending on how leaders use them. I have previously written about SWOT, but in this article, my aim is to compare it with the SOAR model rather than imply that SOAR replaces it.”
SWOT has been a long-standing model in corporate business planning and brand strategy sessions. Infact it can be applied in all facets of life, business and persons. It focuses on strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats. Many companies use it to get a clear picture of their current reality. Its practical nature forces businesses to be honest about the obstacles and risks they face. For example, a retail store might list strong customer service as a strength, poor inventory tracking as a weakness, an expanding population like Lagos as an opportunity and increasing online competition as a threat. The analysis is straightforward and helps decision-makers see where they need to improve.
But SWOT has a limitation that modern leaders are gradually recognising. By concentrating heavily on weaknesses and threats, teams sometimes spend too much energy fixing what is wrong instead of building what is strong. This can create strategies driven by fear, not ambition. A company may become cautious, hesitant or trapped in endless planning. The mindset becomes defensive rather than innovative.
This is where the SOAR model offers a refreshing change. SOAR shifts the focus from shortcomings to potential. It highlights strengths, opportunities, aspirations and results. Instead of beginning with what is lacking, it starts with what is working. This change in tone has a powerful effect on individuals and organisations because it encourages confidence, clarity and forward thinking.
Take a small fashion brand as an example. Using SWOT, the owner might dwell on weaknesses like limited production capacity and threats like cheaper competitors. Using SOAR, the same business begins by recognising its strength in unique designs and strong online engagement. Opportunities arise in collaborations etc. Aspirations become long-term goals such as becoming a recognised lifestyle brand. Results turn into measurable milestones such as monthly sales growth or improved customer retention. The shift in mindset moves the business from survival mode to expansion mode.
In personal development, the difference is just as striking. When someone uses SWOT to assess their life, weaknesses often overshadow strengths. They see their limits more than their abilities. But SOAR helps them recognise what they already do well, and from that foundation, they discover new possibilities. A young professional who fears public speaking might dwell on that weakness in a SWOT exercise. But in SOAR, they notice a strength in writing or relationship building. That opens opportunities to lead projects from behind the scenes, build confidence gradually and set aspirations for leadership roles. Results come through improved performance reviews, better teamwork and personal growth.
The contrast between the two models reflects the demands of modern business. The world is moving fast. Companies cannot succeed by simply avoiding threats. They must build on their unique selling point or proposition (USP). Employees want clarity, not criticism. Customers reward originality, not excuses. Investors trust businesses with direction, not those stuck in self-doubt. SOAR speaks to this new reality. It aligns strategy with purpose, ambition and measurable progress.
However, SWOT is not irrelevant. It remains valuable for risk awareness and situational analysis. Businesses still need to understand what might go wrong. But the strength of SWOT lies in its ability to expose hidden issues, not to determine the full strategic direction. SOAR, on the other hand, helps leaders imagine what they can become and gives them the emotional and practical tools to get there.
The best organisations today often use both models, but with different intentions. They use SWOT to assess the terrain and SOAR to decide the journey. SWOT shows the facts. SOAR shapes the future. One helps you detect danger. The other helps you pursue dreams. When combined wisely, they give a balanced and empowering approach.
The reason SOAR resonates so deeply in modern strategy is simple. People and businesses thrive when their strengths are acknowledged. Confidence grows when leaders speak about possibility. Teams unite when aspirations are clear. Results become more meaningful when they come from a place of purpose. On the battlefield, soldiers are often urged to face the enemy even in moments of weakness and threat. What keeps them moving is not their fear but their aspiration to win, refusing to be trapped by their limitations.As one thoughtful writer said, “You rise by lifting what is already strong.”
In the end, business strategy is not just about charts and analysis. It is about direction, identity and courage. SWOT helps you understand where you stand. SOAR helps you understand where you can go. And when leaders choose to build on their strongest qualities, they move beyond survival. They move toward a future shaped by intention, resilience and hope.
Finally, I want to end by repeating what I told a respected and knowledgeable colleague while discussing my earlier write-up: "it all comes down to perspective, especially a leader’s perspective on both models.”
We improve by learning and rise by practicing.
Uche Ojula arpa
Media and Marketing Consultant.
Advertising and Out of Home Practitioner.
Skyline Communications Limited.